|
1
|
- Presented to
Palo Alto Zero Waste Task Force
February 10, 2005
- by
Gary Liss, Loomis, CA
916-652-7850,
Gary@GaryLiss.com
www.GaryLiss.com
|
|
2
|
- A Policy, Path, Direction
- A Target, Process, Way Of Thinking
- Recognizes 71 Tons “Upstream” For Every Ton MSW
- From Waste Management To Resource Management
- Redesigning Products and Processes for Clean Production
- New Vision For A New Century
|
|
3
|
- Zero Emissions (Air, Water)
- Zero Defects (TQM)
- Zero Inventory (Just in Time)
- Zero Cut (National Forests)
- Sustainable Agriculture
- Sustainable Forestry
- Sustainable Cities
|
|
4
|
- Zero Waste is a goal that is both pragmatic and visionary, to guide
people to emulate sustainable natural cycles, where all discarded
materials are resources for others to use.
- Zero Waste means designing and managing products and processes to reduce
the volume and toxicity of waste and materials, conserve and recover all
resources, and not burn or bury them.
- Implementing Zero Waste will eliminate all discharges to land, water or
air that may be a threat to planetary, human, animal or plant health.
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Nature Is The Model
- Zero Waste, Or Darn Close
- Businesses Have Achieved >90% Waste Diversion
|
|
7
|
- Amdahl Corp.
- Battery Council International
- Brewers of Ontario
- Collins & Aikman
- Epson (OR)
- Fetzer Vineyards
- Hewlett-Packard
- (Roseville, CA)
- Interface
- Mad River Brewery
- Namibian Breweries
- (South Africa)
- Pillsbury
- Xerox Corp
- Zanker Road
|
|
8
|
- New Zealand 1st Nation to Adopt
- 1/2 Of New Zealand Cities
- Winter Olympics 2002
- Seattle, WA
- Halifax, Nova Scotia
- Candon City, Philippines
- Canberra, Australia
- CA Adopted In CIWMB Strategic Plan
- San Francisco, CA
- San Luis Obispo County, CA
- Del Norte County, CA
- Santa Cruz County, CA
- Burbank, CA
|
|
9
|
- No
- Not A Centralized Public Works Project
- Businesses Save $ Through Product & Process Improvements, Redesigns
& More Recycling
|
|
10
|
- The inescapable logic of “zero emissions” for efficiency
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Mining & Manufacturing Impacts Continue
- Landfill Impacts and Liabilities Continue
|
|
14
|
- San Luis Obispo County, CA
- San Francisco, CA
|
|
15
|
- Population 245,200
- 51% Diversion Rate in 1998
- Keys to Zero Waste:
- As easy to recycle as to waste
- Cost effective program
- Incentives and Policies
- C&D Drop Sites & Ordinance
- Schools Curriculum
- Schools Grants
- Model Office
- Public Area Recycling
- Resource Recovery Park
|
|
16
|
- Residential
- “Pay As You Throw” in 20, 32, 64 or 96 gal. carts
- Commerical
- 2 cubic yards of commingled recycling and/or greenwaste as part of
“garbage” service
- Additional recycling or greenwaste collection offered at 25% the cost of
garbage service
- Technical assistance to commercial customers to establish recycling/greenwaste service
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Zero Waste by 2020
- 75% Landfill Diversion by 2010
- Highest and Best Use of Materials
- Consumer and Producer Responsibility
- Precautionary Principle for Purchasing
- Urging State to Adopt Similar Policies
|
|
19
|
- Zero Waste by 2020
- 75% Landfill Diversion by 2010
- Highest and Best Use of Materials
- Consumer and Producer Responsibility
- Precautionary Principle for Purchasing
- Urging State to Adopt Similar Policies
|
|
20
|
- Zero Waste by 2020
- 75% Landfill Diversion by 2010
- Highest and Best Use of Materials
- Consumer and Producer Responsibility
- Precautionary Principle for Purchasing
- Urging State to Adopt Similar Policies
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Adopt a Zero Waste Goal
- Define objectives and policies, including interim goals for 2010 and a
target year to achieve Zero Waste, or darn close.
- Plan for Zero Waste
- Involve residents and businesses in planning
- Prioritize policies, incentives and programs
- Select other “best practices”
- Build alliances and share successes
|
|
23
|
- End Subsidies for Wasting
- Level the playing field
- Adopt policies and economic incentives to reduce wasting in:
- Ordinances
- Contracts and franchises
- Permits and zoning
- General Plans
- Garbage rate structures
- Support state and federal policies to enhance Zero Waste
|
|
24
|
- Build Infrastructure Beyond Recycling
- Support and expand existing reuse, recycling and composting businesses
and non-profits
- Develop locally owned and independent infrastructure on an open,
competitive basis
- Retailers take back products and packaging (ex., for problem materials
not included in residential recycling programs)
- Develop local and regional resource recovery parks to provide locations
for expansion of reuse, recycling and composting businesses
|
|
25
|
- Ask local businesses to
- Adopt Zero Waste goals
- Develop Zero Waste plans
- Adhere to Zero Waste Business principles*
- Meet waste diversion targets
- Source separate designated materials
- Recycle construction, demolition and land-clearing debris, and
deconstruct existing
- Specify contractors and developers develop LEED-certified Green
Buildings
|
|
26
|
- Encourage Clean Production
- Develop clean processes & products
- Adopt Triple Bottom Line
- Take financial or physical responsibility for their products and
packaging
- Include end-of-life services in product pricing
- Use Supply Chain Management and Reverse Logistics to recover products
and packaging
|
|
27
|
- Funding for Zero Waste
- Fund community Zero Waste initiatives with fees levied on the transport,
transfer and disposal of wastes
- Support new Statewide levies on landfills and incinerators to fund Zero
Waste initiatives
- Leverage investments of the private sector
|
|
28
|
- Planning for Zero Waste
- Identify Resources
- Materials Disposed
- Service Voids
- Adopt “Best Practices”
- Select Incentives and Policies
- Not Business as Usual
- Develop Facilities and Programs
- Resource
Recovery Parks
- New Rules for
Landfills
|
|
29
|
- Know Your Waste
- Evaluate 12 Master Categories **
- Determine how and where materials
- discarded
- Identify service
- voids and
- alternatives
- needed
|
|
30
|
- Design It Out
- Zero Waste = design criterion
- Use environmentally preferable purchasing
- Reduce resource use and cut air/water emissions
- Consider ZERI approach (www.zeri.org)
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
- Adopt a Zero Waste Strategy
- Zero Waste Coordinator & Budget
- Know Your Waste
- Build on Existing Investments
- Existing Services and Service Needs
- Policies and Incentives
- Design Out Waste
- Reuse, Recycle, Compost
- Resource Recovery Park
- Landfills as Last Resort
|
|
36
|
- Multi-Level Analysis (Resources,
Policies, Programs, Sectors, Locations)
- Identify Resources (Materials, Services, Models)
- Review Menu of Policies (e.g., Contracts, Incentives, EPR, EPP,
Precautionary Principle)
- Consider New or Expanded Programs
- Food Waste Composting Options
- Expanded Paper Recycling
- Environmental Service Center (Size, Services?)
- Resource Recovery Park (Local and/or Regional)
- Reuse and Used Building Material Facilities
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Organics
- 68.1% of Commercial
- 73.8% of Residential
- Paper
- 35.7% of Commercial
- 27.4% of Residential
- Food
- 18.7% of Commercial
- 20% of Residential
|
|
39
|
- Top 4 Businesses with Most Disposal
- 16.8% = Retail Trade – Restaurants
- 16.3% = Services – Medical/Health
- 11.2% = Retail Trade – Other
- 7.8% = Services – Business Services
- Subtotal = 52.1% of 52,939 Tons Disposed by Businesses in 1999
- 2002 Waste Diversion Rate is 55%*
|
|
40
|
- Analyze Resources (Materials, Services)
- Input from Large and Small Businesses on How They Can Get to Zero Waste
- Prioritize New, Expanded Programs and Facilities (including public vs.
private; local vs. regional; locations)
- Prioritize New Policies Needed and Phasing with Programs and Results
|