|
|
California
Resource Recovery Association
|
|
PO BOX 1228
|
|
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1228
|
|
crra@crra.com
|
|
July 12, 2002
Allison Reynolds
California Integrated Waste Management Board
Permitting and Enforcement Division
P.O. Box 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Subject: COMMENTS ON CIWMB PHASE I PROPOSED
C&D REGULATIONS
Dear Ms. Reynolds:
The Construction & Demolition Council
(CDC) of the California Resource Recovery Association
(CRRA) respectfully submits the following comments and
concerns regarding the Proposed C&D regulations. The
CDC is a Technical Council of CRRA whose members represent
local government, private haulers and processors, consultants,
and other solid waste industry professionals.
The CDC provided comments to the Board via
a letter dated March 4, 2002 (attached as reference).
As it appears there have been no substantive changes,
we request again that the concerns listed in the March
4, 2002 letter be addressed to ensure ease of enforceability,
minimal impact, and equity among the facilities and operators
working to assist California in achieving its waste diversion
goals.
In the event the Board intends to amend
Titles 14 and 17 of the California Code of Regulations
as noticed May 31, 2002, the CDC requests the proposed
amendments be modified to address the additional concerns
expressed in this letter.
COST IMPACTS ON REPRESENTATIVE PRIVATE
PERSONS OR BUSINESSES
|
Per the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
page 5, Board staff's economic research indicated
the initial cost to at least seven facilities potentially
subject to the regulations within six months of
the effective date would be $2,043. The CDC disagrees
with this amount and questions the extent of the
research. Numerous facility operators have indicated
their costs have been or will be much higher.
One facility operator, in anticipation
of implementation of the Proposed Regulations, began
the process last year to acquire a new permit to
operate in a higher tier as would be required by
the Proposed Regulations. The operator has indicated
his costs have exceeded $50,000 so far in consultant
work to prepare the various studies and reports
to satisfy the local planning department. Because
of the wide-ranging requirements (and barriers)
of jurisdictions throughout the state, it is unpredictable
to what extent facilities must submit in order to
acquire the necessary permits to comply with new
"tier placement" as established by the
Proposed Regulations.
|
PHASE-IN OF C&D REGULATIONS
|
The impacted facilities may require
time extensions to comply with their local jurisdiction's
conditions prior to issuance of permits due to the
increasingly restrictive nature of acquiring the
permits. If, under the Proposed Regulations, a facility
must upgrade its permit, the facility may be in
violation of the Proposed Regulations when implemented.
These facilities could be required to cease all
or part of their operations until the proper permits
are obtained, thereby accumulating financial impacts
over and above the costs of acquiring a new permit.
The CDC strongly recommends the
Proposed Regulations include a Phase-In period of
at least twelve (12) months from implementation
of the Proposed Regulations to allow impacted facilities
time to obtain the appropriate permits.
Section 17384, Approval of Alternatives,
of the Proposed Regulations, provides flexibility
for the Enforcement Agency (EA) to determine compliance
in meeting the standard. The CDC strongly recommends
this Section be amended to include "discretionary
authority" of the EA to establish an extension
of this Phase-In period conditioned upon the facility's
ability to demonstrate good faith efforts to acquire
the appropriate permit(s). The EA's are intimately
familiar with the operators/facilities for which
they perform regular inspections and can determine
whether or not the operator's efforts adequately
justify an extension.
|
ABOVE-GROUND DISPOSAL
|
Section 17383.4 sub (a) states, "CDI
debris stored for more than 30 days that has not
been processed or sorted for resale or reuse shall
be deemed to have been disposed." Sub (b) applies
the same condition to processed and sorted material
stored for greater than one-year. Other Sections
have similar language with different time periods
related to when the materials will be deemed disposed.
There has been confusion among facilities and jurisdictions
on how this would be reported and how it might affect
diversion ratings.
Board staff provided clarification
that the intent is to provide authorization for
the EA's to issue a Notice and Order for abatement.
The CDC recommends that the Proposed Regulations
be amended to reflect that clarification.
|
Should you have any further questions or concerns, please
contact me at
(408) 277-3846 or by email at stephen.bantillo@ci.sj.ca.us.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Stephen M Bantillo, Chair
Construction & Demolition Council
California Resource Recovery Association
Attachment
| cc: |
Senator Byron Sher |
District 11 |
| Senator Gloria Romero
|
District 24 |
| Winston Hickox |
Secretary, California Environmental
Protection Agency |
| CIWMB Boardmembers |
Linda Moulton-Patterson, Chair |
| |
Dan Eaton |
| |
Steven R. Jones |
| |
José Medina |
| |
Michael Paparian |
| |
Senator David A. Roberti |
| Cara Morgan |
CIWMB Diversion, Planning & Local Assistance
Division / Office of Local Assistance |